Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Rong, Dailin; Mao, Yize; Hu, Wanming; Xu, Shuhang; Wang, Jun; He, Haoqiang; Li, Shengping; Zhang, Rong.
Afiliación
  • Rong D; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • Mao Y; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • Hu W; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • Xu S; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • Wang J; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • He H; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
  • Li S; Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang R; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Eur Radiol ; 28(7): 2781-2789, 2018 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404768
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the diagnostic potential of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) DWI for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph node stations (LNS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS:

59 LNS histologically diagnosed following surgical resection from 15 patients were included. IVIM DWI with 12 b values was added to the standard MRI protocol. Evaluation of parameters was performed pre-operatively and included the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f). Diagnostic performance of ADC, D, D* and f for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS was evaluated using ROC analysis.

RESULTS:

Metastatic LNS had significantly lower D, D*, f and ADC values than the non-metastatic LNS (p< 0.01). The best diagnostic performance was found in D, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.979, while the area under the ROC curve values of D*, f and ADC were 0.867, 0.855 and 0.940, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were D = 1.180 × 10-3 mm2/s; D* = 14.750 × 10-3 mm2/s, f = 20.65 %, and ADC = 1.390 × 10-3 mm2/s.

CONCLUSION:

IVIM DWI is useful for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic LNS in PDAC. KEY POINTS • IVIM DWI is feasible for diagnosing LN metastasis in PDAC. • Metastatic LNS has lower D, D*, f, ADC values than non-metastatic LNS. • D-value from IVIM model has best diagnostic performance, followed by ADC value. • D* has the lowest AUC value.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Ganglios Linfáticos Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Ganglios Linfáticos Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China