Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The affective and behavioral responses to repeated "strength snacks".
Buckner, S L; Dankel, S J; Mattocks, K T; Jessee, M B; Mouser, J G; Loenneke, J P.
Afiliación
  • Buckner SL; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
  • Dankel SJ; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
  • Mattocks KT; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
  • Jessee MB; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
  • Mouser JG; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
  • Loenneke JP; 1 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi , University, MS, USA.
Physiol Int ; 105(2): 188-197, 2018 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29975122
ABSTRACT
Background A training program consisting of only one-repetition maximum (1RM) training results in similar strength adaptations as traditional resistance exercise. However, little is known regarding the affective or behavioral responses to this type of training. Aim To examine the affective and behavioral response to either a traditional resistance exercise program or a biweekly 1RM-training program. Methods Participants were trained for 8 weeks (2× per week). The HYPER group completed four sets of 8-12 repetitions; the 1RM group (TEST) worked up to a single maximal repetition. Results The TEST group felt more revitalized and had an increase in positive engagement during their first visit, whereas the HYPER group showed an increase in feelings of physical exhaustion during their first and last visits. There were no pre to post differences for the change in behavior or self-efficacy between groups. Conclusion 1RM training appears to elicit a more favorable affective response, compared with HYPER training, which may ultimately improve adherence to resistance-type exercise.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Int Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Int Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos