Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International, multicentre, observational study of fluid bolus therapy in neonates.
Keir, Amy K; Karam, Oliver; Hodyl, Nicolette; Stark, Michael J; Liley, Helen G; Shah, Prakesh S; Stanworth, Simon J.
Afiliación
  • Keir AK; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Karam O; Department of Neonatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hodyl N; Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Medical and Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Stark MJ; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Liley HG; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States.
  • Shah PS; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Stanworth SJ; Department of Neonatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 55(6): 632-639, 2019 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30328174
AIM: To assess the prevalence, types and indications for fluid bolus therapy in neonates with haemodynamic compromise. METHODS: This was a pragmatic, international, multicentre observational study in neonatal units across Australasia, Europe and North America with a predefined study period of 10-15 study days per participating neonatal unit between December 2015 and March 2017. Infants ≤28 days of age who received a fluid bolus for the management of haemodynamic compromise (≥10 mL/kg given at ≤6 h) were included. RESULTS: A total of 163 neonates received a bolus over 8479 eligible patient days in 41 neonatal units. Prevalence of fluid bolus therapy varied between centres from 0 to 28.6% of admitted neonates per day, with a pooled prevalence rate of 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9%). The most common fluid used was 0.9% sodium chloride (129/163; 79%), and the volume of fluid administered was most commonly 10 mL/kg (115/163; 71%) over a median of 30 min (interquartile range 20-60). The most frequent indications were hypotension (n = 56; 34%), poor perfusion (n = 20; 12%) and metabolic acidosis (n = 20; 12%). Minimal or no clinical improvement was reported by clinicians in 66 of 163 cases (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Wide international variations in types, indications and effects of fluid bolus administration in haemodynamically compromised neonates suggest uncertainty in the risk-benefit profile. This is likely to reflect the lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of different fluid types, doses and appropriate indications. Together, these highlight a need for further clinically relevant studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acidosis / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Fluidoterapia / Hipotensión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Paediatr Child Health Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acidosis / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Fluidoterapia / Hipotensión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Paediatr Child Health Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia