Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of abdominal peripheral nerve block and caudal block during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective clinical study.
Noguchi, Satoko; Saito, Junichi; Nakai, Kishiko; Kitayama, Masato; Hirota, Kazuyoshi.
Afiliación
  • Noguchi S; Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. nogusato1110@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
  • Saito J; Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
  • Nakai K; Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
  • Kitayama M; Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
  • Hirota K; Department of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
J Anesth ; 33(1): 103-107, 2019 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523407
PURPOSE: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of abdominal peripheral nerve block (PNB) and caudal block (CB) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Patients who underwent elective RARP at our hospital (Jan. 2015-Sept. 2016) were enrolled. We reviewed the 188 patients' anesthesia charts and medical records and divided the patients into three groups based on the anesthesia used in their cases: 76 patients in the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group, 51 patients in the TIVA + abdominal PNB group (TI-PB group), and 61 patients in the TIVA + abdominal PNB + CB (TI-PB-CB group). We compared the groups' amounts of anesthetic drug usage, anesthesia times, and the presence/absence of additional opioid administration in the recovery room. RESULTS: The perioperative opioid use during anesthesia was significantly greater in the TIVA group than in the TI-PB-CB group. The total amount of muscle relaxant was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the TIVA group than the TI-PB-CB group: 60.0 (50.0-70.0) mg vs. 50.0 (40.0-60.0) mg. Although there were no significant differences in the operation time, the frequency of the use of additional opioid administration was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the TIVA group than the TI-PB group: 23.7% vs. 2.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no influence on the anesthesia time, the muscle relaxant dose and the perioperative amount of opioid use were significantly less in the combined PNB + CB group. Our analyses suggest that not only PNB but also CB was useful for perioperative management in RARP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2016-1059.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Laparoscopía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Laparoscopía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados / Bloqueo Nervioso Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón