Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging with or without Biopsy Impacts Decision Making in Newly Diagnosed Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer.
Ginsburg, Kevin B; Arcot, Rohith; Qi, Ji; Linsell, Susan M; Kaye, Deborah R; George, Arvin K; Cher, Michael L.
Afiliación
  • Ginsburg KB; Departments of Urology, Wayne State University , Detroit.
  • Arcot R; University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan.
  • Qi J; Departments of Urology, Wayne State University , Detroit.
  • Linsell SM; University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan.
  • Kaye DR; Departments of Urology, Wayne State University , Detroit.
  • George AK; University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan.
  • Cher ML; Departments of Urology, Wayne State University , Detroit.
J Urol ; 201(5): 923-928, 2019 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694939
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We investigated how magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy impact decision making in men considering active surveillance. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We reviewed the records of men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative with newly diagnosed favorable risk prostate cancer. Following diagnostic biopsy the men were classified into 3 groups, including group 1-no magnetic resonance imaging, group 2-magnetic resonance imaging only and group 3-magnetic resonance imaging/post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy. For the purposes of counseling and shared decision making magnetic resonance imaging results were deemed reassuring (PI-RADS™ [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System] 3 or less) or nonreassuring (PI-RADS 4 or greater). Similarly, if the diagnostic biopsy was GG (Grade Group) 1, post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy results were deemed nonreassuring if there was any amount of GG 2 or greater. If the diagnostic biopsy was GG 2, post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy results were deemed nonreassuring if more than 3 cores were GG 2, or there was more than 50% GG 2 in any individual core or any volume of GG 3 or greater.

RESULTS:

Of 1,461 men with favorable risk prostate cancer 1,223 (84%) did not undergo magnetic resonance imaging, 157 (11%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging alone and 81 (6%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy. Of the men who underwent magnetic resonance imaging alone more with reassuring findings elected active surveillance than men with nonreassuring or magnetic resonance imaging findings (74% vs 35% and 42%, respectively). The highest rate of active surveillance was noted in men with reassuring post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy regardless of whether magnetic resonance imaging was reassuring or nonreassuring (93% and 96%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy drive decision making in men with newly diagnosed, favorable risk prostate cancer. Post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy is a stronger driver of decision making than magnetic resonance imaging alone. This was demonstrated by the more than 90% of men with reassuring post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsies who elected active surveillance regardless of magnetic resonance imaging results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article