Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ergogenic Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation During Rest and Submaximal Exercise.
Tseh, Wayland; Champion, Hollie M; Ek, Susanna; Frazier, Will R; Kinslow, Anna E; McClain, Caroline W; Barreira, Tiago V.
Afiliación
  • Tseh W; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Champion HM; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Ek S; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Frazier WR; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Kinslow AE; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • McClain CW; School of Health and Applied Human Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Barreira TV; School of Education, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci ; 12(3): 203-313, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761202
The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the ergogenic effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) amongst twenty apparently healthy males during submaximal exercise. In Session 1, 20 participants (Age = 35.0 ± 15.0 yrs; Height = 179.9 ± 8.5 cm; Body Mass = 85.4 ± 12.0 kg) were familiarized with all equipment. Sessions 2-4 included the following randomized 5-min trials a) Rest and Rest+NMES, b) Rest, Arms-Only, Arms+NMES, and c) Rest, Arms+Legs, Arms+Legs+NMES. Physiological variables collected during rest and submaximal exercise were volume of oxygen (VO2), heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and rate pressure product (RPP). Paired sample t-test was used to determine significant mean differences between the NMES and non-NMES trials. Bonferroni post-hoc analysis established alpha at 0.008. From the 18 paired t-tests, the only observed significant mean difference (t(19) = -6.4, p < 0.001) was RER values between the Arms-Only trial compared to the Arms+NMES trial (0.94 and 1.00, respectively). While RER displayed a significant difference, from a practical perspective, however, these differences were deemed non-physiologically significant. Viewed in concert, findings from this study suggests that NMES utilization does not evoke an acute ergogenic effect amongst an apparently healthy male population.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Int J Exerc Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Int J Exerc Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos