Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in risk factors for binge eating by socioeconomic status in a community-based sample of adolescents: Findings from Project EAT.
West, Caroline E; Goldschmidt, Andrea B; Mason, Susan M; Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne.
Afiliación
  • West CE; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
  • Goldschmidt AB; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center/The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Mason SM; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Neumark-Sztainer D; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Int J Eat Disord ; 52(6): 659-668, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30939228
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Binge eating is prevalent across socioeconomic status (SES) groups, but it is unclear whether risk factors for binge eating vary by SES. This study examined the prevalence of several risk factors for binge eating by SES and SES as a potential moderator of these risk factors.

METHOD:

Participants included 2,179 individuals involved in Project EAT during early/middle adolescence (EAT-I) and 5 years later during late adolescence/emerging adulthood (EAT-II). Risk ratios were computed using modified Poisson regression of incident EAT-II binge eating on EAT-I risk factors among participants of high and low SES. Interactions between each risk factor and SES were tested.

RESULTS:

Among higher SES adolescents, overweight/obesity (RR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.8, 5.7), body dissatisfaction (RR = 2.6; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.2, 5.5), dieting (RR = 4.0; 95% CI 2.0, 8.2), and family weight-teasing (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3, 4.3) predicted increased risk for binge eating. Among adolescents from low-SES backgrounds, overweight/obesity (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 0.9, 2.5), dieting (RR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.2, 3.9), and food insecurity (RR = 1.4; 95% CI 0.7, 2.7) predicted increased risk for binge eating. Moderator analyses revealed that overweight/obesity, body dissatisfaction, dieting, and family weight-teasing were stronger risk factors in the high-SES group than the low-SES group; interactions with food insecurity could not be examined given the low prevalence of food insecurity in the high-SES group.

DISCUSSION:

Risk factors for binge eating may vary by SES, suggesting the potential utility of modifying intervention and prevention methods based on SES. In particular, the role of food insecurity must be addressed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clase Social / Trastorno por Atracón Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Eat Disord Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clase Social / Trastorno por Atracón Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Eat Disord Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article