Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Episodic and Chronic Migraine in Primary Care.
Young, Nathan P; Philpot, Lindsey M; Vierkant, Robert A; Rosedahl, Jordan K; Upadhyaya, Sudhindra G; Harris, Ann; Ebbert, Jon O.
Afiliación
  • Young NP; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Philpot LM; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Vierkant RA; Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Rosedahl JK; Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Upadhyaya SG; Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Harris A; Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Ebbert JO; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Headache ; 59(7): 1042-1051, 2019 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31032913
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To inform migraine care model development by assessing differences between patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) in the current state of treatment, disability, patient satisfaction, and quality improvement opportunities.

BACKGROUND:

Efficient and focused use of scarce resources will be needed to address challenges within large populations of migraine patients.

METHODS:

We deployed a cross-sectional survey study of randomly selected migraine patients within a community primary care practice.

RESULTS:

There were 516 survey respondents (516/1804 [30%] response rate). CM patients were more likely than EM patients to report care from a neurologist (76/110 [69%] vs 229/406 [56%]; P = .0026), and higher disability according to the Migraine Disability Assessment and Headache Impact Test - 6 questionnaires (P < .0001). CM patients were less likely than EM patients to report overall satisfaction with care (16/110 [38%] vs 156/406 [66%], P = .0002), satisfaction with access to care (17/110 [33%] vs 176/406 [68%], P < .0001), and advice they needed (16/110 [31%] vs 160/406 [62%], P < .0001). Most patients with migraine had been offered triptan medications 377/516 (78%). Overall, 156/516 (31%) of individuals were currently taking any medication for migraine prevention, and 208/516 (40%) including botulinum toxin injections. CM patients were more likely to be taking preventive medication (39/110 [36%] vs 117/406 [29%], P = .0191) and report familiarity with the diagnosis of medication-overuse headache than patients with EM (80/110 [81%] vs 256/406 [69%], P = .0178).

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed differences between patients with chronic and EM and expected care delivery improvement opportunities for migraine patients in primary care. CM patients report higher levels of disability and less satisfaction with access to perceived needed medical advice and care. These findings support the need to further develop and study novel care models to efficiently and effectively deliver high-quality care and expertise in limited supply to a diverse migraine population.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Satisfacción del Paciente / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud / Trastornos Migrañosos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Headache Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Satisfacción del Paciente / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud / Trastornos Migrañosos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Headache Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos