Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase I/II clinical trial of modulated electro-hyperthermia treatment in patients with relapsed, refractory or progressive heavily treated ovarian cancer.
Yoo, Heon Jong; Lim, Myong Cheol; Seo, Sang-Soo; Kang, Sokbom; Joo, Jungnam; Park, Sang-Yoon.
Afiliación
  • Yoo HJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejon, South Korea.
  • Lim MC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University hospital, Daejon, South Korea.
  • Seo SS; Gynecologic Cancer Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital and Cancer Control and Public Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Kang S; Gynecologic Cancer Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital and Cancer Control and Public Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Joo J; Gynecologic Cancer Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital and Cancer Control and Public Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Park SY; Cancer Biostatistics Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 49(9): 832-838, 2019 Sep 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31070763
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) treatment and to reveal whether mEHT treatment is feasible and effective as second-line therapy in recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer.

METHODS:

Patients were treated with mEHT with dose escalation during the first cycle (two sessions each week for three weeks) to determine the MTD. Additional cycles were carried out with the determined dose. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined grade ≥ 2 skin burns and inability to endure the hyperthermic state of the study. The Fact-O quality of life scale was used to assess health-related well-being.

RESULTS:

Nineteen patients with recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer were enrolled. In the first cycle of mEHT treatment, no patient developed DLT with applied power up to 110 W, 130 W, and 150 W/day; the 150 W was the maximal applied power. Stable disease was observed in only one patient (12.5%). With median progression of 4.0 months (range, 2-17 months), 18 patients (95%) demonstrated disease progression. With median overall survival of 8.0 months (range, 2-32 months), 18 patients (95%) had died. Physical well-being scores were significantly decreased over the study period, although social, emotional, and functional well-being scores did not significantly change.

CONCLUSIONS:

The mEHT treatment was feasible in patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer without any complication and optimal dose of mEHT treatment was up to 150 W for 1 hour/day.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Dosis Máxima Tolerada / Hipertermia Inducida Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Clin Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Dosis Máxima Tolerada / Hipertermia Inducida Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Clin Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur