Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association.
Fontana, Mark Alan; Lyman, Stephen; Islam, Wasif; MacLean, Catherine H.
Afiliación
  • Fontana MA; Center for the Advancement of Value in Musculoskeletal Care, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
  • Lyman S; Department of Healthcare Policy & Research (M.A.F. and S.L.), Weill Cornell Medical College (W.I.), New York, NY.
  • Islam W; Center for the Advancement of Value in Musculoskeletal Care, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
  • MacLean CH; Department of Healthcare Policy & Research (M.A.F. and S.L.), Weill Cornell Medical College (W.I.), New York, NY.
JB JS Open Access ; 4(1): e0044, 2019 Mar 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31161152
BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome relationships are well established for coronary artery bypass grafting and total joint arthroplasty surgery. Although the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings program includes outcome quality measures for these procedures, these outcome quality measures are not counted toward the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We sought to assess whether excluding low-volume hospitals from surgical quality measures with known volume-outcome relationships affects the star ratings. METHODS: We identified quality measures used in CMS's star ratings that are related to surgical procedures with a known volume-outcome relationship and tested for the presence of the volume-outcome association for each of these measures. We then imputed missing values for low-volume hospitals for each measure and otherwise identically repeated the CMS calculations in order to assess the percentages of hospitals with the same, better, or worse ratings. RESULTS: Among the measures used to calculate star ratings, we identified 4 quality measures (2 related to coronary artery bypass grafting and 2 related to total joint arthroplasty) with known volume-outcome relationships that were excluded from the calculations of the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We confirmed a volume-outcome association in the CMS data for all 4 measures. When total joint arthroplasty complications were imputed for low-volume hospitals and then included in the calculation of the star ratings, over one-third of hospitals received a different rating; both low-volume and other hospitals were more often hurt than helped. Imputing the other 3 quality measures among low-volume hospitals left the ratings unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The CMS star ratings do not fully represent the risks of undergoing procedures at low-volume hospitals, potentially misrepresent quality across facilities, and hence are of uncertain utility to consumers.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JB JS Open Access Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JB JS Open Access Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article