Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selecting and quantifying low-value nursing care in clinical practice: A questionnaire survey.
Osorio, Dimelza; Zuriguel-Pérez, Esperanza; Romea-Lecumberri, Soledad; Tiñena-Amorós, Montserrat; Martínez-Muñoz, Montserrat; Barba-Flores, Ángeles.
Afiliación
  • Osorio D; Health Services Research Group-Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Zuriguel-Pérez E; Center for Biomedical Research in the Epidemiology and Public Health Network (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Romea-Lecumberri S; Nursing Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Tiñena-Amorós M; Health Services Research Group-Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez-Muñoz M; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Barba-Flores Á; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Nurs ; 28(21-22): 4053-4061, 2019 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31287603
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinion of hospital nurses on a group of recommendations aimed at reducing low-value nursing care and, based on these results, to detect low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. BACKGROUND: Low-value nursing care refers to clinical practices with poor or no benefit for patients that may be harmful and a waste of resources. Detecting these practices and understanding nurses' perceptions are essential to developing effective interventions to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a survey in a tertiary hospital. STROBE guidelines were followed. The questionnaire appraised nurses' agreement, subjective adherence and perception of usefulness of a group of recommendations to reduce low-value nursing care from Choosing Wisely and other initiatives. Practices described in recommendations with an agreement over 70% and a subjective adherence under 70% were categorised as low-value practices probably existing in the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 265 nurses from eight areas of care participated in the survey. The response rate by area ranged between 2%-55%. From the 38 recommendations evaluated, agreement was 96% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 95%-97%), median subjective adherence was 80% (95%CI, 80%-85%), and usefulness was 90% (95%CI, 89%-92%). Based on these results, we detected seven (0-15) low-value practices probably existing in our hospital, mostly on general practice, pregnancy care and wound care. CONCLUSIONS: We found a great understanding of low-value care between nurses, given the high agreement to recommendations and perception of usefulness. However, several low-value practices may be present in nursing care, requiring actions to reduce them, for instance, reviewing institutional protocols and involving patients in de-implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospitals and other settings should be aware of low-value practices and take actions to identify and reduce them. A survey may be a simple and helpful way to start this process.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Enfermería en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Enfermería en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España