Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and feasibility of thullium laser transurethral resection of prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement in overweight patients.
Carmignani, Luca; Clementi, Maria Chiara; Signorini, Claudia; Motta, Gloria; Nazzani, Sebastiano; Palmisano, Franco; De Lorenzis, Elisa; Catellani, Michele; Mistretta, Alessandro Francesco; Conti, Andrea; Tringali, Valeria; Costa, Maria Beatrice; Vizziello, Damiano.
Afiliación
  • Carmignani L; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
  • Clementi MC; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
  • Signorini C; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
  • Motta G; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
  • Nazzani S; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
  • Palmisano F; Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • De Lorenzis E; Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Catellani M; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Mistretta AF; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Conti A; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Tringali V; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Costa MB; Ospedale San Giuseppe, Urology, Milan, Italy.
  • Vizziello D; Policlinico San Donato, Urology, San Donato, Milanese, Italy.
Asian J Urol ; 6(3): 270-274, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31297319
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to determine safety and feasibility of thulium laser transurethral vapoenucleation of prostate (ThuVEP) for treatment of obese patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS:

We retrospectively analysed data of 452 patients with BPH who underwent ThuVEP from February 2012 to March 2016 in a single center. Patients were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25; Group A), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30; Group B) and obese (BMI ≥ 30; Group C), for a total of 412 patients evaluable for this study. Preoperative total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination of the prostate, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), renal ultrasound, urine culture, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and Quality of Life (QoL) score were analyzed. Post-operative complications, hospital stay and days of catheterization, questionnaires and uroflowmetry at 1 and 3 months after surgery were evaluated. Preoperative data, surgical outcomes, complication rate and clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS:

The median age of patients was 69 years (Interquartile Range [IQR 10]). The preoperative median IPSS among groups was 19 (IQR 8.75), 20 (IQR 10), and 18 (IQR 10) respectively. At 1 and 3 months of follow-up, this value was 8 (IQR 7), 8 (IQR 4), 7 (IQR 5) and 5 (IQR 6.25), 5 (IQR 6), 6 (IQR 5), respectively (all p between groups > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among three groups as for hospital stay and days of catheterization (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Our results showed that ThuVEP was safe and feasible even in overweight patients with substantially enlarged prostate.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian J Urol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian J Urol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia