Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lynch syndrome screening in gynaecological cancers: results of an international survey with recommendations for uniform reporting terminology for mismatch repair immunohistochemistry results.
Ryan, Neil; Wall, Johanna; Crosbie, Emma J; Arends, Mark; Bosse, Tjalling; Arif, Saimah; Faruqi, Asma; Frayling, Ian; Ganesan, Raji; Hock, Ye L; McMahon, Raymond; Manchanda, Ranjit; McCluggage, W Glenn; Mukonoweshuro, Pinias; van Schalkwyk, Gerhard; Side, Lucy; Smith, John H; Tanchel, Bruce; Evans, D Gareth; Gilks, C Blake; Singh, Naveena.
Afiliación
  • Ryan N; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Wall J; Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Crosbie EJ; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Arends M; Division of Pathology & Centre for Comparative Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Bosse T; Pathology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Arif S; Department of Cellular Pathology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Harlow, UK.
  • Faruqi A; Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Frayling I; Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Ganesan R; Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hock YL; Department of Histopathology, Manor Hospital, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, UK.
  • McMahon R; Department of Histopathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Manchanda R; Department of Surgical Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • McCluggage WG; Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
  • Mukonoweshuro P; Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
  • van Schalkwyk G; Pathology Department, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
  • Side L; Department of Clinical Genetics, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK.
  • Smith JH; Sheffield Department of Histopathology & Cytology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Tanchel B; Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Evans DG; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Gilks CB; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Singh N; Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Histopathology ; 75(6): 813-824, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310679
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of developing endometrial carcinoma (EC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). There is considerable variability in current practices and opinions related to screening of newly diagnosed patients with EC/OC for LS. An online survey was undertaken to explore the extent of these differences. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

An online questionnaire was developed by a panel of experts and sent to all members of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP) and the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP). Anonymised results were received and analysed. Thirty-six BAGP and 44 ISGyP members completed the survey. More than 90% of respondents were aware of the association of LS with both EC and OC, but 34% were not aware of specific guidelines for LS screening. Seventy-one per cent of respondents agreed that universal screening for LS should be carried out in all newly diagnosed EC cases, with immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone as the preferred approach. Only 36% of respondents currently performed IHC or microsatellite instability testing on all newly diagnosed EC cases, with most of the remaining respondents practising selective screening, based on clinical or pathological features or both. A significant minority of respondents (35%) believed that patient consent was required before performance of mismatch repair (MMR) protein IHC. Almost all respondents favoured the use of standardised terminology for reporting MMR protein staining results, and this is proposed herein.

CONCLUSION:

There is wide support for universal LS screening in patients with EC, but this survey highlights areas of considerable variation in practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis / Neoplasias Endometriales / Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Histopathology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis / Neoplasias Endometriales / Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Histopathology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido