Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method.
Shenkin, Susan D; Fox, Christopher; Godfrey, Mary; Siddiqi, Najma; Goodacre, Steve; Young, John; Anand, Atul; Gray, Alasdair; Hanley, Janet; MacRaild, Allan; Steven, Jill; Black, Polly L; Tieges, Zoë; Boyd, Julia; Stephen, Jacqueline; Weir, Christopher J; MacLullich, Alasdair M J.
Afiliación
  • Shenkin SD; Geriatric Medicine, Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Room S1642, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh 51, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
  • Fox C; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
  • Godfrey M; Elderly Care and Rehabilitation and Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Siddiqi N; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Hull York Medical School, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
  • Goodacre S; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Young J; Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Anand A; Cardiovascular Sciences and Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Gray A; Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hanley J; Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
  • MacRaild A; Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Steven J; Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Black PL; Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Tieges Z; Geriatric Medicine, Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Room S1642, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh 51, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
  • Boyd J; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Stephen J; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Weir CJ; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • MacLullich AMJ; Geriatric Medicine, Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Room S1642, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh 51, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. a.maclullich@ed.ac.uk.
BMC Med ; 17(1): 138, 2019 07 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337404
BACKGROUND: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 'A's Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com ) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0-12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61-87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92-97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26-57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98-100%). CONCLUSIONS: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093 . Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Confusión / Delirio / Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina / Pruebas Neuropsicológicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Confusión / Delirio / Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina / Pruebas Neuropsicológicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article