Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Graduated compression stockings in prevention of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years: a French national survey.
Gramont, Baptiste; Chalayer, Émilie; Savall, Angélique; Killian, Martin; Celarier, Thomas; Tardy, Bernard.
Afiliación
  • Gramont B; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, CHU, Saint Etienne, France.
  • Chalayer É; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, CHU, Saint Etienne, France.
  • Savall A; Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC-EC 1408, Saint Etienne, France.
  • Killian M; Department of Education and Research in General Practice, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France.
  • Celarier T; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, CHU, Saint Etienne, France.
  • Tardy B; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, CHU, Saint Etienne, France.
Clin Interv Aging ; 14: 1153-1157, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31417245
ABSTRACT

Background:

The thromboprophylactic efficacy of graduated compression stockings (GCS) has not yet been demonstrated in acutely ill medical patients, and guidelines vary considerably. Older acutely ill medical patients appear to constitute a distinctive population presenting high risks of both thrombosis and bleeding.

Objective:

To evaluate the practices and beliefs of a panel of French geriatricians regarding GCS management in acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years.

Methods:

A survey was designed to study French geriatric practice concerning GCS use for thromboprophylaxis.

Results:

A total of 111 geriatricians answered the questionnaire. Among the responders, 46% declared frequent or very frequent prescription of GCS for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients, 54% declaring that they frequently re-evaluated GCS prescription during the patient's hospitalization. The main reason reported for discontinuing GCS use was patient request. Regarding complications of GCS, 87% of responders declared having already noted adverse effects with the use of GCS, although 80% estimated the risk of complications to be low or very low. In the context considered, the efficacy of wearing GCS was believed to be high or very high for 73% of responders. GCS prescription was judged to be in accordance with evidence-based medicine for 69%.

Conclusion:

There is a gap between the frequent use of GCS to prevent VTE in older patients presenting an acute medical illness and the availability of data concerning their efficacy, safety, and management by nurses. Prospective trials including clinical and cost effectiveness are needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Medias de Compresión / Tromboembolia Venosa / Geriatras Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Interv Aging Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Medias de Compresión / Tromboembolia Venosa / Geriatras Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Interv Aging Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia