Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes in advanced melanoma.
Franken, Margreet G; Leeneman, Brenda; Gheorghe, Maria; Uyl-de Groot, Carin A; Haanen, John B A G; van Baal, Pieter H M.
Afiliación
  • Franken MG; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: franken@imta.eur.nl.
  • Leeneman B; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gheorghe M; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Uyl-de Groot CA; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Haanen JBAG; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Baal PHM; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer ; 123: 58-71, 2019 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31670077
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although a myriad of novel treatments entered the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, there is lack of head-to-head evidence. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate each treatment's relative effectiveness and safety.

METHODS:

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane to identify all phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a time frame from January 1, 2010 to March 11, 2019. We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evidence was synthesised using a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbazine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin. To increase homogeneity of the study populations, RCTs were only included if patients were not previously treated with novel treatments.

RESULTS:

The SLR identified 28 phase III RCTs involving 14,376 patients. Nineteen and seventeen treatments were included in the effectiveness and safety NMA, respectively. For PFS, dabrafenib plus trametinib (hazard ratio [HR] PFS 0.21) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR PFS 0.22) were identified as most favourable treatments. Both had, however, less favourable safety profiles. Five other treatments closely followed (dabrafenib [HR PFS 0.30], nivolumab plus ipilimumab [HR PFS 0.34], vemurafenib [HR PFS 0.38], nivolumab [HR PFS 0.42] and pembrolizumab [HR PFS 0.46]). In contrast, for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR OS 0.39), nivolumab (HR OS 0.46) and pembrolizumab (HR OS 0.50) were more favourable than dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR OS 0.55) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR OS 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our NMA identified the most effective treatment options for advanced melanoma and provided valuable insights into each novel treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. This information may facilitate evidence-based decision-making and may support the optimisation of treatment and outcomes in everyday clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico; Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico; Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico; Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico; Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico; Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación; Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico; Azetidinas/administración & dosificación; Azetidinas/uso terapéutico; Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación; Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico; Carboplatino/administración & dosificación; Carboplatino/uso terapéutico; Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación; Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico; Humanos; Hidrazinas/administración & dosificación; Hidrazinas/uso terapéutico; Imidazoles/administración & dosificación; Imidazoles/uso terapéutico; Interleucina-2/administración & dosificación; Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico; Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación; Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico; Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación; Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico; Melanoma/inmunología; Melanoma/patología; Metaanálisis en Red; Compuestos de Nitrosourea/administración & dosificación; Compuestos de Nitrosourea/uso terapéutico; Nivolumab/administración & dosificación; Nivolumab/uso terapéutico; Compuestos Organofosforados/administración & dosificación; Compuestos Organofosforados/uso terapéutico; Oximas/administración & dosificación; Oximas/uso terapéutico; Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación; Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico; Piperidinas/administración & dosificación; Piperidinas/uso terapéutico; Supervivencia sin Progresión; Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales; Piridonas/administración & dosificación; Piridonas/uso terapéutico; Pirimidinonas/administración & dosificación; Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico; Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología; Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología; Sorafenib/administración & dosificación; Sorafenib/uso terapéutico; Tasa de Supervivencia; Temozolomida/administración & dosificación; Temozolomida/uso terapéutico; Resultado del Tratamiento
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Vacunas contra el Cáncer / Melanoma / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Vacunas contra el Cáncer / Melanoma / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article