The utility of preoperative radiological evaluation of early rectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Colorectal Dis
; 22(9): 1076-1084, 2020 09.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32052545
ABSTRACT
AIM:
The diagnostic role for preoperative imaging of clinically benign rectal adenomas is unclear. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative imaging in distinguishing benign adenomas from rectal cancer.METHOD:
A systematic search was performed for all studies published that correlated staging of clinically benign rectal adenomas with endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) or MRI and histology. Imaging was compared with postoperative histology and data on the numbers of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives were extracted. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs were calculated using a bivariate random effects model. The QUADAS2 tool was used to determine the methodological quality of included studies.RESULTS:
Eleven studies describing 1511 patients were retrieved. A total of 1134 patients underwent local excision and 377 had a formal proctectomy. A benign rectal adenoma was diagnosed in 840 and 214 had a T1 rectal cancer. For confirming benign adenomas, the pooled sensitivity of ERUS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.89) and specificity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.93). For detecting occult T1 tumours, the pooled sensitivity of ERUS was 0.50 (95% CI 0.33-0.66) and specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.94). Quantitative analysis of MRI could not be performed due to insufficient studies.CONCLUSION:
This study demonstrates the limited accuracy of preoperative ERUS in distinguishing benign adenomas from T1 rectal cancer. Preoperative imaging must be interpreted with caution to prevent over-staging and unnecessary proctectomy. We propose that clinically benign lesions may undergo local excision, with subsequent management based on final histology.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias del Recto
/
Endosonografía
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Colorectal Dis
Asunto de la revista:
GASTROENTEROLOGIA
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Irlanda