Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Higher Level Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Oncology Care: A Systematic Review.
Klarenbeek, Sosse E; Weekenstroo, Harm H A; Sedelaar, J P Michiel; Fütterer, Jurgen J; Prokop, Mathias; Tummers, Marcia.
Afiliación
  • Klarenbeek SE; Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Weekenstroo HHA; Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Sedelaar JPM; Department of Urology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Fütterer JJ; Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Prokop M; Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Tummers M; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(4)2020 Apr 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32331449
BACKGROUND: To deal with complexity in cancer care, computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are developed to support quality of care and improve decision-making. We performed a systematic review to explore the value of CDSSs using automated clinical guidelines, Artificial Intelligence, datamining or statistical methods (higher level CDSSs) on the quality of care in oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy combined synonyms for 'CDSS' and 'cancer.' Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Association of Computing Machinery digital library and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to December 2019. Included studies evaluated the impact of higher level CDSSs on process outcomes, guideline adherence and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 11,397 studies were selected for screening, after which 61 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, nine studies were included in the final analysis with a total population size of 7985 patients. Types of cancer included breast cancer (63.1%), lung cancer (27.8%), prostate cancer (4.1%), colorectal cancer (3.1%) and other cancer types (1.9%). The included studies demonstrated significant improvements of higher level CDSSs on process outcomes and guideline adherence across diverse settings in oncology. No significant differences were reported for clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Higher level CDSSs seem to improve process outcomes and guidelines adherence but not clinical outcomes. It should be noticed that the included studies primarily focused on breast and lung cancer. To further explore the impact of higher level CDSSs on quality of care, high-quality research is required.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos