Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cortical bone trajectory technique's outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective study.
Petrone, Salvatore; Marengo, Nicola; Ajello, Marco; Lavorato, Andrea; Penner, Federica; Cofano, Fabio; Zenga, Francesco; Garbossa, Diego.
Afiliación
  • Petrone S; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. Electronic address: svt.petrone@gmail.com.
  • Marengo N; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Ajello M; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Lavorato A; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Penner F; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Cofano F; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Zenga F; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Garbossa D; Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
J Clin Neurosci ; 76: 25-30, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32331945
Cortical Bone Trajectory screws allow a limited soft tissue dissection with mechanical properties comparable to traditional pedicle screws. However, clinical results are still reported on limited samples. The study aimed to evaluate perioperative and mid-term follow up outcomes, clinical results and complications in 238 consecutive patients underwent CBT fusion for degenerative lumbosacral disease. Pre- and intraoperative data, clinical outcomes and complications were collected. The patients were stratified in three groups. The original technique was performed in the first 43 cases without a preoperative CT scan planning. The second group includes the patients who underwent preoperative CT scan for entry point and screw trajectory planning (158 patients). Surgical procedures in the last group were performed with patient-matched 3D printed guide (37 patients). The accuracy in screws positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scan. The mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Mean ODI and VAS index improved with statistical significance. Mean procedural time was 187, 142 and 124 min in the three subgroups. The total amount of recorded complications was 4.2% (16.3%, 3.8% and 0.0% respectively). Screws entirely within the cortex of the pedicle were 78.9%, 90.5% and 93.9% in the three groups. Fusion was obtained in 92.4% of cases. The CBT technique is a safe procedure, especially with an accurate preoperative CT scan-based planning. This seems more evident with the 3D template patient-matched guide. More studies are needed to directly compare traditional pedicle screws and CBT screws on long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Tornillos Óseos / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Tornillos Óseos / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article