[Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi
; 58(7): 530-538, 2020 Jul 01.
Article
en Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32610424
ABSTRACT
To compare short-term and long-term efficacy after laparoscopic left hepatectomy(LLR) to open left hepatectomy(OLH) for primary left-sided hepatolithiasis. Methods:
Clinical data of 187 patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis and underwent laparoscopically or open left-sided hepatectomy from October 2014 to October 2019 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed in this propensity score matching (PSM) study and were matched in terms of age, sex, body mass index, liver function, ASA score, comorbidities, history of biliary surgery, and smoking history on the ratio of 1â¶1.There were 47 cases in each group and the mean age were (54.7±12.3)years old(range34 to 75 years old) and (53.2±12.6) years old (range 34 to 75 years old) in open and laparoscopically group respectively. The data of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital-stay, complication rate, biliary fistula rate, stone clearance rate, and stone recurrence rate were compared. The quantitative data were compared using t-test or rank-sum test. Count data were analyzed with χ(2) test or Fisher test.Results:
No significant difference was observed in the clinical characteristics of included 94 patients in this study(all P>0.05).The length of the postoperative hospital-stay after OLH was significantly higher than that in the LLH group((10.8±3.1) days vs.(8.5±2.2)days, t=4.085, P=0.000). LLR significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula compared with the OLH (6.3% vs.21.2%, χ(2)=4.374, P=0.036) and the rates of postoperative complications in the OLH group was significantly higher than that in the LLH group (48.9% vs.27.6%, χ(2)=4.502, P=0.034). Moreover, the stone recurrence rates in the LLH group was significantly lower than that after OLR (4.2% vs. 17.0%, χ(2)=4.029, P=0.045). OLH (95% CI 1.55 to 10.75, P=0.004) and postoperative complications (95% CI 1.29 to 9.52, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay. OLH (95% CI 1.428 to 44.080, P=0.018) and residual stones (95% CI 1.580 to 62.379, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative biliary fistula. Biliary fistula (95% CI 1.078 to 24.517, P=0.040) was an independent risk factor for the recurrence of stones.Conclusion:
Compared with OLH, LLH is safe and effective for the treatment of the primary left-sided hepatolithiasis with the clinical benefits of shorter hospital stay, fewer morbidity and biliary fistula occurrence, and lower stone recurrence rates.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Litiasis
/
Hepatectomía
/
Hepatopatías
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
China