Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence based approaches to cell function prediction.
Padi, Sarala; Manescu, Petru; Schaub, Nicholas; Hotaling, Nathan; Simon, Carl; Bharti, Kapil; Bajcsy, Peter.
Afiliación
  • Padi S; ITL, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Manescu P; ITL, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Schaub N; National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Hotaling N; National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Simon C; MML, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Bharti K; National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Bajcsy P; ITL, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32864421
ABSTRACT
Predicting Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) cell functions in stem cell implants using non-invasive bright field microscopy imaging is a critical task for clinical deployment of stem cell therapies. Such cell function predictions can be carried out using Artificial Intelligence (AI) based models. In this paper we used Traditional Machine Learning (TML) and Deep Learning (DL) based AI models for cell function prediction tasks. TML models depend on feature engineering and DL models perform feature engineering automatically but have higher modeling complexity. This work aims at exploring the tradeoffs between three approaches using TML and DL based models for RPE cell function prediction from microscopy images and at understanding the accuracy relationship between pixel-, cell feature-, and implant label-level accuracies of models. Among the three compared approaches to cell function prediction, the direct approach to cell function prediction from images is slightly more accurate in comparison to indirect approaches using intermediate segmentation and/or feature engineering steps. We also evaluated accuracy variations with respect to model selections (five TML models and two DL models) and model configurations (with and without transfer learning). Finally, we quantified the relationships between segmentation accuracy and the number of samples used for training a model, segmentation accuracy and cell feature error, and cell feature error and accuracy of implant labels. We concluded that for the RPE cell data set, there is a monotonic relationship between the number of training samples and image segmentation accuracy, and between segmentation accuracy and cell feature error, but there is no such a relationship between segmentation accuracy and accuracy of RPE implant labels.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Inform Med Unlocked Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Inform Med Unlocked Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos