Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in lumbar spine measures as a function of MRI posture in low back pain patients and its clinical implications.
Rustagi, Tarush; Mendel, Ehud; Ferguson, Sue A; Mallepally, Abhinandan Reddy; Thomas, William J; Splittstoesser, Riley E; Dufour, Jonathan S; Marras, William S.
Afiliación
  • Rustagi T; Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Mendel E; Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Ferguson SA; Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Mallepally AR; Biodynamics Laboratory, Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Thomas WJ; Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Splittstoesser RE; Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Dufour JS; Biodynamics Laboratory, Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Marras WS; Biodynamics Laboratory, Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Int J Neurosci ; 132(5): 511-520, 2022 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32942932
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE:

The primary objective was to determine if there were differences in spine structure measures between experimental postures and standard supine posture MRIs.

METHODS:

Thirty-four low back pain patients were included. MRI was taken in 6 experimental postures. The dependent measures includes sagittal view anterior (ADH), middle and posterior disc heights, thecal sac width, left/right foraminal height (FH). In the axial view disc width, left and right foraminal height. Measures were done L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Each subject served as their own control. Spine measurements in the experimental posture were compared to the same measures in the standard supine posture.

RESULTS:

94% inter-observer reliability was seen. In the sagittal and axial view, 55 of the 108 and 11 of the 18 measures were significantly different. In sagittal view a) ADH was significantly smaller in the sitting flexed posture by 2.50 mm ± 0.63 compared to the supine posture; b) ADH in sitting neutral posture was significantly smaller than the standard posture by 1.97 mm ± 0.86; c) sitting flexed posture showed that bilateral FH measures were significantly different; d) Bilateral FH was larger in the sitting neutral posture compared to the standard supine posture by 0.87 mm ± 0.17.

CONCLUSIONS:

This research quantifies the differences in spine structure measures that occur in various experimental postures. The additional information gathered from an upright MRI may correlate with symptoms leading to an accurate diagnosis and assist in future spine research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neurosci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neurosci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos