Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative Pain: An Analysis on Evolution of Research in Half-Century.
Nosrat, Ali; Dianat, Omid; Verma, Prashant; Nixdorf, Donald R; Law, Alan S.
Afiliación
  • Nosrat A; Division of Endodontics, Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Maryland; Private Practice, Centreville Endodontics, Centreville, Virginia. Electronic address: Nosrat@umaryland.edu.
  • Dianat O; Division of Endodontics, Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Verma P; Division of Endodontics, Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Baltimore, Maryland; Private Practice, Centreville Endodontics, Centreville, Virginia; Private Practice, Capitol Endodontics, Washington, DC.
  • Nixdorf DR; Division of TMD and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, Minnesota.
  • Law AS; Private Practice, The Dental Specialists, Lake Elmo, Minnesota; Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Endod ; 47(3): 358-365, 2021 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33271179
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Examining the evolution of research parameters helps scientists to discover the well-developed and neglected aspects of knowledge. Pain after root canal treatment is a health problem affecting millions of patients. Research in this field has a meaningful impact on quality of lives. The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of research on postoperative pain over the past 50 years.

METHODS:

Electronic searches were performed in Scopus and MEDLINE databases to identify studies on pain after nonsurgical root canal treatments/retreatments. The full texts of eligible articles were reviewed to determine the study category and to extract and analyze the methodological variables. A series of statistical analyses were performed to determine the trend of publications based on the variable of interest over time.

RESULTS:

Four hundred twenty-four articles were included. There was a positive trend for systematic reviews, studies with sample size <200, studies on single-visit treatment, and clinical trials on instrumentation and adjunct treatments (P < .05). There was a negative trend for the use of numeric rating scales, studies on multiple-visit treatments, clinical trials on medication/medicament, and studies on pain in maxillary incisors (P < .05). No trend was observed based on pulpal diagnosis or for studies with longer observation periods (>8 weeks) (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

A paradigm shift is needed toward clinical studies with larger sample sizes, longer observation periods, and more focus on pulpal diagnoses associated with higher rates of postoperative pain. There is a need to view postoperative pain as an important patient-centered outcome and to develop and disseminate standard reporting guidelines for future studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Tratamiento del Conducto Radicular Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endod Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Tratamiento del Conducto Radicular Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endod Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article