Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Recombinant Activated Factor VII for the Management of Bleeding With Cardiac Surgery.
Katz, Alyson; Ahuja, Tania; Arnouk, Serena; Lewis, Tyler C; Marsh, Kassandra; Papadopoulos, John; Merchan, Cristian.
Afiliación
  • Katz A; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ahuja T; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Arnouk S; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lewis TC; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Marsh K; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Papadopoulos J; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Merchan C; Department of Pharmacy, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(2): 231-239, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33402016
Bleeding following cardiac surgery that warrants transfusion of blood products is associated with significant complications, including increased mortality at 1 year following surgery. Factor concentrates, such as prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) have been used off-label for bleeding in cardiac surgery that is refractory to conventional therapy. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the hemostatic effectiveness of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa for bleeding after a broad range of cardiac surgeries. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and had undergone cardiac surgery with bleeding requiring intervention with 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. There were no differences observed in the number of packed red blood cells (4-factor PCC: 2 units vs. rFVIIa: 2 units), fresh frozen plasma (0 units vs. 1 unit) or platelet (2 units vs. 2 units) transfusions following the administration of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. The patients in the rFVIIa group, required more cryoprecipitate than those in the 4-factor PCC group (4-factor PCC: 2 units (range 0-6) vs. rFVIIa: 2 units (range 0-8), p = 0.03). There were no differences in secondary outcomes of chest tube output at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours, nor was there a difference in reexploration rates or the median length of stay in the intensive care unit. Thromboembolic complications at 30 days were similar between the two groups (4-factor PCC: 13% vs. rFVIIa 26%, p = 0.08). The total median dose requirement for 4-factor PCC was 1000 units (15 units/kg) and 2 mg (20 mcg/kg) for rFVIIa. The results demonstrate feasibility of utilizing the minimum amount of drug in order to achieve a desired effect. Both 4-factor PCC and rFVIIa appear to be safe and effective options for the management of bleeding associated with cardiac surgery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes / Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea / Factor VIIa / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos / Hemorragia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes / Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea / Factor VIIa / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos / Hemorragia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos