Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Toward patient-centered tuberculosis preventive treatment: preferences for regimens and formulations in Lima, Peru.
Yuen, Courtney M; Millones, Ana K; Galea, Jerome T; Puma, Daniela; Jimenez, Judith; Lecca, Leonid; Becerra, Mercedes C; Keshavjee, Salmaan.
Afiliación
  • Yuen CM; Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Courtney_Yuen@hms.harvard.edu.
  • Millones AK; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Courtney_Yuen@hms.harvard.edu.
  • Galea JT; Socios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
  • Puma D; School of Social Work, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Jimenez J; College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Lecca L; Socios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
  • Becerra MC; Socios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
  • Keshavjee S; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 121, 2021 01 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33430823
BACKGROUND: To ensure patient-centered tuberculosis preventive treatment, it is important to consider factors that make it easier for patients to complete treatment. However, there is little published literature about patient preferences for different preventive treatment regimen options, particularly from countries with high tuberculosis burdens. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative research study using a framework analysis approach to understand tuberculosis preventive treatment preferences among household contacts. We conducted three focus group discussions with 16 members of families affected by tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. Participants were asked to vote for preferred preventive treatment regimens and discuss the reasons behind their choices. Coding followed a deductive approach based on prior research, with data-driven codes added. RESULTS: In total, 7 (44%) participants voted for 3 months isoniazid and rifapentine, 4 (25%) chose 3 months isoniazid and rifampicin, 3 (19%) chose 4 months rifampicin, and 2 (13%) chose 6 months isoniazid. Preferences for shorter regimens over 6 months of isoniazid were driven by concerns over "getting tired" or "getting bored" of taking medications, the difficulty of remembering to take medications, side effects, and interference with daily life. For some, weekly dosing was perceived as being easier to remember and less disruptive, leading to a preference for 3 months isoniazid and rifapentine, which is dosed weekly. However, among caregivers, having a child-friendly formulation was more important than regimen duration. Caregivers reported difficulty in administering pills to children, and preferred treatments available as syrup or dispersible formulations. CONCLUSIONS: There is demand for shorter regimens and child-friendly formulations for tuberculosis preventive treatment in high-burden settings. Individual preferences differ, suggesting that patient-centered care would best be supported by having multiple shorter regimens available.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tuberculosis / Isoniazida Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Peru Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tuberculosis / Isoniazida Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Peru Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos