Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effectiveness of Caudal Block with Low Doses of Dexmedetomidine and Pethidine in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Preliminary Results.
Akyüz, Osman; Kiliç, Bahriye; Gündogan, Sertan; Ergün, Müslüm; Bodakçi, Mehmet Nuri; Çoban, Soner; Tefekli, Ahmet Hamdi; Çam, Kamil.
Afiliación
  • Akyüz O; Medicine Hospital Department of Urology, Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Kiliç B; Medicine Hospital Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gündogan S; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Esencan Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ergün M; Medicine Hospital Department of Urology, Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Bodakçi MN; Deparment of Urology, Avcilar Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Çoban S; Department of Urology, Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Educational Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
  • Tefekli AH; Medicine Hospital Department of Urology, Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Çam K; Medical Faculty Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Invest Surg ; 35(3): 511-516, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550855
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of caudal block (CB) using dexmedetomidine and pethidine instead of local anesthesia (LA) for prostate needle biopsy and the effect of CB on urinary retention. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was performed on 68 patients with a mean age of 65 ± 2.18 years. CB with a combination of dexmedetomidine and pethidine without LA was administered to the patients. The pain levels of the patients were determined using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores to evaluate the effectiveness of CB. Preoperative and postoperative postvoid residual urine volumes (PRUV) were also calculated.

RESULTS:

The CB success rate was 93.15%. The NRS scores were 0.79 ± 0.19 and 0.89 ± 0.22 during probe entry and manipulation and biopsy, respectively, without any significant differences between them (p = 0.382). The mean PRUVs before and after biopsy did not differ significantly (41 ± 15.6 vs. 71.93 ± 22.3, p = 0.379). The degree of sedation, as assessed using the Ramsay scale, was 2 or 3 in all patients.

CONCLUSION:

The combination of dexmedetomidine and pethidine for CB in TRUS-Bx provided quality analgesia for the patient and prevented the development of postoperative urinary retention.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dexmedetomidina Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Invest Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dexmedetomidina Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Invest Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía