Assessing adherence to objective disease monitoring and outcomes with adalimumab in a real-world IBD cohort.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data suggests that tight objective monitoring may improve clinical outcomes in IBD. AIM: To assess the adherence to serial tight objective monitoring(clinical and biomarkers) and its effect on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart of 428 consecutive IBD patients started on adalimumab between January 1,2015-January 1,2019 [338 Crohn's disease(CD), 90 ulcerative colitis(UC)]. Clinical symptoms(assessed by Harvey-Bradshaw-Index,partial Mayo),C-Reactive Protein(CRP), and fecal calprotectin(FCAL) assessments were captured at treatment initiation and at 3,6,9, and12 months. Dose optimization and drug sustainability curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation was available in nearly all patients at 3(CD-UC95-94%), 6(90-83%), 9(86-85%) and 12(96-89%) months. CRP testing frequency decreased in CD patients over time. Compliance to serial FCAL testing was low. Clinical remission at one-year was higher in patients adherent to early assessment visit at 3 months(p = 0.001 for CD and UC). Adherence to early follow-up resulted in earlier dose optimization in CD and UC patients(pLogrank=0.026 for UC & p = 0.09 for CD). Overall drug sustainability did not differ. CONCLUSION: Clinical & CRP, but not FCAL, were frequently assessed in patients starting adalimumab. Adherence to early objective combined follow-up visits resulted in earlier dose optimization, improved one-year clinical outcomes but did not change drug sustainability.