Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical Student Ultrasound Education: The Radiology Chair Weighs In.
Sohaey, Roya; Di Salvo, Donald N; Bluth, Edward I; Lockhart, Mark E; Cohen, Harris L; Pellerito, John S; Baltarowich, Oksana H; Nisenbaum, Harvey L; Coleman, Beverly G.
Afiliación
  • Sohaey R; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Di Salvo DN; Dana Farber Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Bluth EI; Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA.
  • Lockhart ME; University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL.
  • Cohen HL; University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
  • Pellerito JS; Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY.
  • Baltarowich OH; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College.
  • Nisenbaum HL; Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia.
  • Coleman BG; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Ultrasound Q ; 37(1): 3-9, 2021 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661796
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT To assess the radiology department chairs' opinions concerning current status and plans for teaching ultrasound to medical students, the American College Taskforce on Radiology Ultrasound Education, commissioned by the American College of Radiology, distributed a survey to 142 radiology chairs and a medical school dean subgroup.The response rate was 30% (42/142), and 76% indicated ultrasound was currently part of the medical student curriculum. In preclinical years, radiology involvement was only 6.4%. During clinical years, radiology led ultrasound education with 51.7% in general and 82.9% in elective rotations. Regarding actual content, top 4 results were evenly distributed between learning hands-on scanning (81.1%), diagnostic use of ultrasound (75.7%), anatomy/pathology (75.7%), and ultrasound guidance for procedures (54.0%). Educational leaders in preclinical courses were emergency medicine (72.7%) followed by radiology (45.4%) physicians. During clinical years, leaders were radiology (52.6%) and emergency medicine (47.4%) physicians. Most chairs stated that knowledge of diagnostic ultrasound should be mandatory (76.2%), stressing the importance of teaching the diagnostic capabilities and uses of ultrasound as the primary goal (78.8%). Perceived barriers to implementation were evenly distributed between lack of space in the curriculum (55.6%), lack of faculty (48.2%), lack of resources (44.4%), and lack of institutional support (40.7%). The American College Taskforce on Radiology Ultrasound Education survey shows that radiology's role in ultrasound undergraduate education occurs almost exclusively during clinical years, and the chairs voice a desire to improve upon this role. Barriers include both intradepartmental (faculty and resources) and institutional (curricular) factors.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Estudiantes de Medicina / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ultrasound Q Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Estudiantes de Medicina / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ultrasound Q Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article