Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validating Whole Slide Imaging Systems for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology.
Evans, Andrew J; Brown, Richard W; Bui, Marilyn M; Chlipala, Elizabeth A; Lacchetti, Christina; Milner, Danny A; Pantanowitz, Liron; Parwani, Anil V; Reid, Kearin; Riben, Michael W; Reuter, Victor E; Stephens, Lisa; Stewart, Rachel L; Thomas, Nicole E.
Afiliación
  • Evans AJ; From the Department of Pathology, Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada (Evans).
  • Brown RW; The Department of Pathology, Memorial Hermann Southwest Hospital, Houston, Texas (Brown).
  • Bui MM; The Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Bui).
  • Chlipala EA; Premier Laboratory, LLC, Longmont, Colorado (Chlipala).
  • Lacchetti C; Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Lacchetti).
  • Milner DA; American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, Illinois (Milner).
  • Pantanowitz L; The Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Pantanowitz).
  • Parwani AV; The Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani).
  • Reid K; Governance Services (Reid).
  • Riben MW; The Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Riben).
  • Reuter VE; The Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Reuter).
  • Stephens L; The Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Stephens).
  • Stewart RL; Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania (Stewart).
  • Thomas NE; Surveys (Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(4): 440-450, 2022 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003251
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT.­ The original guideline, "Validating Whole Slide Imaging for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology," was published in 2013 and included 12 guideline statements. The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to update the guideline following standards established by the National Academies of Medicine for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE.­ To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and provide updated recommendations for validating whole slide imaging (WSI) systems used for diagnostic purposes. DESIGN.­ An expert panel performed a systematic review of the literature. Frozen sections, anatomic pathology specimens (biopsies, curettings, and resections), and hematopathology cases were included. Cytology cases were excluded. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, the panel reassessed and updated the original guideline recommendations. RESULTS.­ Three strong recommendations and 9 good practice statements are offered to assist laboratories with validating WSI digital pathology systems. CONCLUSIONS.­ Systematic review of literature following release of the 2013 guideline reaffirms the use of a validation set of at least 60 cases, establishing intraobserver diagnostic concordance between WSI and glass slides and the use of a 2-week washout period between modalities. Although all discordances between WSI and glass slide diagnoses discovered during validation need to be reconciled, laboratories should be particularly concerned if their overall WSI-glass slide concordance is less than 95%.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Microscopía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Microscopía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article