Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cognitive Control of Working Memory: A Model-Based Approach.
Boag, Russell J; Stevenson, Niek; van Dooren, Roel; Trutti, Anne C; Sjoerds, Zsuzsika; Forstmann, Birte U.
Afiliación
  • Boag RJ; Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Stevenson N; Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Dooren R; Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Trutti AC; Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Sjoerds Z; Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Forstmann BU; Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Brain Sci ; 11(6)2021 May 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34071635
ABSTRACT
Working memory (WM)-based decision making depends on a number of cognitive control processes that control the flow of information into and out of WM and ensure that only relevant information is held active in WM's limited-capacity store. Although necessary for successful decision making, recent work has shown that these control processes impose performance costs on both the speed and accuracy of WM-based decisions. Using the reference-back task as a benchmark measure of WM control, we conducted evidence accumulation modeling to test several competing explanations for six benchmark empirical performance costs. Costs were driven by a combination of processes, running outside of the decision stage (longer non-decision time) and showing the inhibition of the prepotent response (lower drift rates) in trials requiring WM control. Individuals also set more cautious response thresholds when expecting to update WM with new information versus maintain existing information. We discuss the promise of this approach for understanding cognitive control in WM-based decision making.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos