Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic reviews in surgery-recommendations from the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery.
Kalkum, Eva; Klotz, Rosa; Seide, Svenja; Hüttner, Felix J; Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich; Nickel, Felix; Khajeh, Elias; Knebel, Phillip; Diener, Markus K; Probst, Pascal.
Afiliación
  • Kalkum E; Study Center of the German Society of Surgery (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Klotz R; Study Center of the German Society of Surgery (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Seide S; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hüttner FJ; Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kowalewski KF; Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
  • Nickel F; Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Khajeh E; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Knebel P; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Diener MK; Study Center of the German Society of Surgery (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Probst P; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(6): 1723-1731, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129108
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Systematic reviews are an important tool of evidence-based surgery. Surgical systematic reviews and trials, however, require a special methodological approach.

PURPOSE:

This article provides recommendations for conducting state-of-the-art systematic reviews in surgery with or without meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

For systematic reviews in surgery, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) should be searched. Critical appraisal is at the core of every surgical systematic review, with information on blinding, industry involvement, surgical experience, and standardisation of surgical technique holding special importance. Due to clinical heterogeneity among surgical trials, the random-effects model should be used as a default. In the experience of the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery, adherence to these recommendations yields high-quality surgical systematic reviews.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos / Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos / Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania