Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Budget Impact of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy (SECURE-Trial).
Latenstein, Carmen S S; van Dijk, Aafke H; Wennmacker, Sarah Z; Drenth, Joost P H; Westert, Gert P; van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M; Boermeester, Marja A; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W; de Reuver, Philip R.
Afiliación
  • Latenstein CSS; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: carmen.latenstein@radboudumc.nl.
  • van Dijk AH; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, the Netherlands.
  • Wennmacker SZ; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Drenth JPH; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Westert GP; IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Laarhoven CJHM; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Boermeester MA; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, the Netherlands.
  • Dijkgraaf MGW; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Reuver PR; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: philip.dereuver@radboudumc.nl.
J Surg Res ; 268: 59-70, 2021 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284321
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing restrictive strategy versus usual care in patients with gallstones showed that savings by restrictive strategy could not compensate for the lower proportion of pain-free patients. However, four subgroups based on combined stratification factors resulted in less cholecystectomies and more pain-free patients in restrictive strategy (female-low volume-BMI > 30, female-low volume-BMI25-30, female-high volume-BMI25-30, and male-low volume-BMI < 25). The aim of this study was to explore the budget impact from a hospital healthcare perspective of implementation of restrictive strategy in these subgroups.

METHODS:

Data of the SECURE-trial were used to calculate the hospital budget impact with a time horizon of four years. Based on a study into practice variation, about 19% of hospitals treat patients according restrictive strategy. This represents the proportion of patients treated according restrictive strategy at the start of budget period. Three subanalyses were performed a scenario analysis in which 30% of patients fall under a restrictive strategy in clinical practice, a sensitivity analysis in which we calculated the budget impact with the low and high 95% confidence limits of the expected future number of patients, a subgroup analysis in which restrictive strategy was also implemented in two additional subgroups (male-high volume-BMI < 25 and female-high volume-BMI >30).

RESULTS:

Budget impact analysis showed savings of €6.7-€15.6 million (2.2%-5.6%) for the period 2021-2024/2025 by implementing the restrictive strategy in the four subgroups and provision of usual care in other patients. Sensitivity analysis with 30% of patients already in the restrictive strategy at the start of the budget period, resulted in savings between €5.4 million and €14.0 million (1.7%-5.0%).

CONCLUSION:

Performing a restrictive strategy for selection of cholecystectomy in subgroups of patients and provision of usual care in other patients will result in a lower overall hospital budget needed to treat patients with abdominal pain and gallstones. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022. Registered on June 5, 2013.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colecistectomía / Cálculos Biliares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colecistectomía / Cálculos Biliares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article