Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial blood flow and hemodynamic variables in adenosine and regadenoson vasodilator 82-Rubidium PET.
Frey, Simon M; Honegger, Ursina; Clerc, Olivier F; Caobelli, Federico; Haaf, Philip; Zellweger, Michael J.
Afiliación
  • Frey SM; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Honegger U; Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Clerc OF; Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. honegger.ursina@bluewin.ch.
  • Caobelli F; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Haaf P; Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Zellweger MJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 29(3): 921-933, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386864
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

In most Rubidium-(Rb)-positron emission tomography (PET) studies, dipyridamole was used as vasodilator. The aim was to evaluate vasodilator PET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial blood flow (MBF), hemodynamics, and the influence of adenosine and regadenoson on these variables. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Consecutive patients (N = 2299) with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) or no prior CAD undergoing adenosine/regadenoson 82Rb-PET were studied and compared according to CAD status and normal/abnormal PET (summed stress score 0-3 vs. ≥4). Rest and stress LVEF differed significantly depending on CAD status and scan results. In patients with no prior CAD, rest/stress LVEF were 68% and 72%, in patients with prior CAD 60% and 63%. LVEF during stress increased 5 ± 6% in normal compared to 1 ± 8% in abnormal PET (P<0.001). Global rest myocardial blood flow(rMBF), stress MBF(sMBF) and myocardial flow reserve (sMBF/rMBF) were significantly higher in no prior CAD patients compared to prior CAD patients(1.3 ± 0.5, 3.3 ± 0.9, 2.6 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 0.4, 2.6 ± 0.8, 2.4 ± 0.8 ml/g/min, respectively, P<0.001) and in normal versus abnormal scans, irrespective of CAD status(no prior CAD 1.4 ± 0.5, 3.5 ± 0.8, 2.8 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 0.8, 2.5 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 0.7; prior CAD 1.3 ± 0.4, 3.1 ± 0.8, 2.7 ± 0.8 and 1.1 ± 0.4, 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.2 ± 0.7 ml/g/min, respectively, P<0.001). LVEF and hemodynamic values were similar for adenosine and regadenoson stress. Stress LVEF ≥70% excluded relevant ischemia (≥10%) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% (CI 92-95%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Rest/stress LVEF, LVEF reserve and MBF values are lower in abnormal compared to normal scans. Adenosine and regadenoson seem to have similar effect on stress LVEF, MBF and hemodynamics. A stress LVEF ≥70% has a high NPV to exclude relevant ischemia.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Nucl Cardiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Nucl Cardiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza