Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Acotiamide Versus Mosapride in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia Associated With Meal-Induced Postprandial Distress Syndrome: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sinha, Shubhadeep; Chary, Sreenivasa; Thakur, Pankaj; Talluri, Leela; Reddy, Mohan; K, Gautam S; Mohan, Jagan M; Jain, Pankaj; Naik, Sunil; C Reddy, Srinivas V.
Afiliación
  • Sinha S; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
  • Chary S; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
  • Thakur P; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
  • Talluri L; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
  • Reddy M; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, IND.
  • K GS; Internal Medicine, Shri Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, IND.
  • Mohan JM; Gastroenterology, New Government General Hospital, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
  • Jain P; Internal Medicine, Sterling Hospital, Vadodara, IND.
  • Naik S; General Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Srikakulam, IND.
  • C Reddy SV; Department of Medicine, King George Hospital, Andhra Medical College, Vishakhapatnam, IND.
Cureus ; 13(9): e18109, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34692320
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

 Acotiamide is a novel prokinetic drug that acts by enhancing the release of acetylcholine and is used in the treatment of functional dyspepsia-postprandial distress syndrome (FD-PDS). Mosapride is indicated to FD-PDS as per the Rome III treatment guidelines. Mosapride 5 mg three times daily (TID) is approved by the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for the treatment of FD-PDS. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of Acotiamide in comparison with Mosapride on FD-PDS.

METHODS:

The 220 patients of either gender (aged 18-64 years) with active PDS included in the study were centrally randomized 11 to receive either 100 mg Acotiamide (test product) or 5 mg Mosapride (reference product) TID for four weeks. Responder rates for the overall treatment effect (OTE) at the end of four weeks were the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the elimination rate of postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating, and early satiation. The study also evaluated the OTE at each week, individual symptom scores, and quality of life (QoL) assessed by the Short Form-Nepean Dyspepsia Index questionnaire (SF-NDI). The safety endpoints included assessments of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS:

 At the end of four weeks, the responders in the Acotiamide versus Mosapride group for OTE was 98% versus 93.27% in the per-protocol (PP) population. Among the intent to treat (ITT) population, the comparison of Acotiamide versus Mosapride stood at 95.15% versus 89.81%. Secondary efficacy endpoints were significantly improved with 100 mg TID Acotiamide, which was evident from the improvement in postprandial fullness (14.56%), upper abdominal bloating (15.53%), early satiation (10.68%), and QoL (13.7 ± 4.67).

CONCLUSIONS:

 Our study results demonstrated that Acotiamide is effective, safe, and well-tolerated and had significantly improved the QoL over a four-week treatment period in FD-PDS patients. The efficacy and safety profiles of Acotiamide were similar to Mosapride.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article