Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Occupational psychosocial stressors and mental distress among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic.
Silva-Junior, João Silvestre; Cunha, Arthur Arantes da; Lourenção, Daniela Campos de Andrade; Silva, Silmar Maria da; Silva, Renata Flavia Abreu da; Faria, Magda Guimarães de Araujo; Mininel, Vivian Aline; Almeida, Mirian Cristina Dos Santos; Baptista, Patrícia Campos Pavan; Gallasch, Cristiane Helena.
Afiliación
  • Silva-Junior JS; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Cunha AAD; Universidade Federal do Amapá, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
  • Lourenção DCA; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Silva SMD; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
  • Silva RFAD; Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Faria MGA; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Mininel VA; Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
  • Almeida MCDS; Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Palmas, TO, Brazil.
  • Baptista PCP; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Gallasch CH; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 19: eAO6281, 2021.
Article en En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34755826
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors associated with mental distress among health workers who cared for patients with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A cross-sectional analytical study of national scope, carried out between in the second quarter of 2020. A total of 437 health professionals, who filled out an electronic form about sociodemographic data, occupational aspects, psychosocial characteristics of work and mental distress. Multiple logistic regression was performed to analyze the covariables associated with mental distress. RESULTS: There was a predominance of workers on the nursing team (65.0%), female (71.0%), from Southeastern region of the country (68.6%) and with no morbidities (36.2%). The prevalence of mental distress was 61.6%. Job strain was reported by 24% of participants, and the perception of low support from coworkers was described by 52.9%. The final multiple regression model showed that mental distress was associated with females (odds ratio - OR: 1.93; 95%CI: 1.22-3.07), age up to 40 years (OR: 1.64; 95%CI: 1.07-2.52), weekly working hours equal or over 60 hours (OR: 1.87; 95%CI: 1.15-3.11), job strain (OR: 2.45; 95%CI: 1.41-4.40) and low support from co-workers (OR: 3.47; 95%CI: 2.26-5.38). CONCLUSION: Six out of ten participants presented mental distress, which was associated to both individual characteristics and factors related to the work carried out during the pandemic. There is an urgent need to map services that have such characteristics, to outline actions to promote mental health and prevent emotional distress at different levels of health care.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil