The Wolfson Assessment Matrix: a potential tool to support clinicians in establishing access to specialized neuro rehabilitation by capturing important prognostic factors. Sharing more equitable and transparent criteria.

BACKGROUND: Specialized Rehabilitation Services (SRSs) are designed to offer intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation to patients with complex needs, who are expected to make significant functional gains in their ADLs over a relatively limited period of time. Although national guidelines offer a guidance on how to band patients by complexity, there is no consensus on how to screen patients with regard to rehabilitation prognosis. AIM: The aim of this study was to improve the selection of patients admitted to an SRS, defining transparent and equitable prognostic criteria to guide clinicians' decision making. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study SETTING: an SRS in the UK. POPULATION: We included 121 patients affected by a neurological condition consecutively admitted for multidisciplinary rehabilitation. METHODS: Rehabilitation Complexity Scale Extended is used to describe rehabilitation complexity. A short list of potential barriers to rehabilitation was analysed to predict the functional outcome measured by the Functional Independent Measure and the Barthel Index. RESULTS: Older age, a heavier burden of co-morbidities, pre-morbid cognitive difficulties or dementia and a lower function level at admission were the most important variables to predict a lower functional gain. CONCLUSIONS: We have used this list of barriers to create the Wolfson Assessment Matrix as a potential support tool to guide clinicians navigating through the different rehabilitation service options when assessing complex patients for eligibility to an SRS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: SRSs are highly expensive services representing a possible step along the rehabilitation pathway for patients with complex needs. A tool such as the Wolfson Assessment Matrix would represent a step forward to help consistency in decision making regarding appropriateness for SRSs. It would also help to set realistic long-term goals with patients and families and support Health Services in the further development of alternative rehabilitation settings.