Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of post appendicectomy intra-abdominal collections: A volumetric cut off for drainage?
Bough, Georgina M; Singh, Rashmi R; Johnson, Bethan; Soorasangaram, Mathanki; Mahbubani, Krishnaa T; Joshi, Ashwini; Sharif, Shazia P.
Afiliación
  • Bough GM; Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom.
  • Singh RR; Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom.
  • Johnson B; Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom.
  • Soorasangaram M; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mahbubani KT; Department of Surgery, Collaborative Biorepository for Translational Medicine, Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Joshi A; Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom.
  • Sharif SP; Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom. Electronic address: shazia.sharif4@nhs.net.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(2): 245-249, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34952694
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intra-abdominal collections (IAC) are a common complication following appendicectomy, one of the most commonly performed emergency abdominal procedures in childhood. The option to drain a collection is frequently available but not always required.

AIM:

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of medically and procedurally-managed post appendicectomy IACs and suggest a method of standardising the need for intervention.

METHODS:

A single centre, retrospective review of children aged ≤ 16 years presenting between 2014 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, management, and outcome data were collected. IAC volume and surface area were calculated assuming a prolate spheroid or true ellipsoid depending on the number of dimensions reported.

RESULTS:

60 patients (18%) of 334 patients developed an IAC post appendicectomy. Medical management was undertaken in 44 (73%), drainage in 12 (20%), and surgical washout in 4 (7%). Collection size was associated with failure of medical management maximum diameter (p = 0.028), volume (p = 0.002), and surface area (p = 0.001). Collections with a volume of 2 ml/kg were significantly less likely to fail medical management than larger collections (0/33 vs 6/11; p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION:

Not all post appendicectomy IACs require drainage. The relationship between collection volume and need for drainage is more closely assessed using a volume calculation rather than a single dimension measurement, particularly when adjusted for weight of the child. A cut off of 2 ml/kg appears to be a good objective measure for intervention and provides a communication tool for discussion amongst the multidisciplinary team. Prospectively collected multicentre data on this subject would be timely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido