Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital Tools in Behavior Change Support Education in Health and Other Students: A Systematic Review.
Gosak, Lucija; Stiglic, Gregor; Budler, Leona Cilar; Félix, Isa Brito; Braam, Katja; Fijacko, Nino; Guerreiro, Mara Pereira; Lorber, Mateja.
Afiliación
  • Gosak L; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Stiglic G; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Budler LC; Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Félix IB; Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.
  • Braam K; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Fijacko N; Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Guerreiro MP; Faculty of Healthcare, Sports and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 3521 Haarlem, The Netherlands.
  • Lorber M; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 10(1)2021 Dec 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35052165
ABSTRACT
Due to the increased prevalence of chronic diseases, behavior changes are integral to self-management. Healthcare and other professionals are expected to support these behavior changes, and therefore, undergraduate students should receive up-to-date and evidence-based training in this respect. Our work aims to review the outcomes of digital tools in behavior change support education. A secondary aim was to examine existing instruments to assess the effectiveness of these tools. A PIO (population/problem, intervention, outcome) research question led our literature search. The population was limited to students in nursing, sports sciences, and pharmacy; the interventions were limited to digital teaching tools; and the outcomes consisted of knowledge, motivation, and competencies. A systematic literature review was performed in the PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SAGE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases and by backward citation searching. We used PRISMA guidelines 2020 to depict the search process for relevant literature. Two authors evaluated included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) independently. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 15 studies in the final

analysis:

six quantitative descriptive studies, two randomized studies, six mixed methods studies, and one qualitative study. According to the MMAT, all studies were suitable for further analysis in terms of quality. The studies resorted to various digital tools to improve students' knowledge of behavior change techniques in individuals with chronic disease, leading to greater self-confidence, better cooperation, and practical experience and skills. The most common limitations that have been perceived for using these tools are time and space constraints.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Eslovenia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Eslovenia