Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selection and Drift: A Comparison between Historic and Recent Dutch Friesian Cattle and Recent Holstein Friesian Using WGS Data.
Hulsegge, Ina; Oldenbroek, Kor; Bouwman, Aniek; Veerkamp, Roel; Windig, Jack.
Afiliación
  • Hulsegge I; Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Oldenbroek K; Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bouwman A; Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Veerkamp R; Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Windig J; Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Animals (Basel) ; 12(3)2022 Jan 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35158654
Over the last century, genetic diversity in many cattle breeds has been affected by the replacement of traditional local breeds with just a few milk-producing breeds. In the Netherlands, the local Dutch Friesian breed (DF) has gradually been replaced by the Holstein Friesian breed (HF). The objective of this study is to investigate genomewide genetic diversity between a group of historically and recently used DF bulls and a group of recently used HF bulls. Genetic material of 12 historic (hDF), 12 recent DF bulls (rDF), and 12 recent HF bulls (rHF) in the Netherlands was sequenced. Based on the genomic information, different parameters-e.g., allele frequencies, inbreeding coefficient, and runs of homozygosity (ROH)-were calculated. Our findings showed that a large amount of diversity is shared between the three groups, but each of them has a unique genetic identity (12% of the single nucleotide polymorphisms were group-specific). The rDF is slightly more diverged from rHF than hDF. The inbreeding coefficient based on runs of homozygosity (Froh) was higher for rDF (0.24) than for hDF (0.17) or rHF (0.13). Our results also displayed the presence of several genomic regions that differentiated between the groups. In addition, thirteen, forty-five, and six ROH islands were identified in hDF, rDF, and rHF, respectively. The genetic diversity of the DF breed reduced over time, but this did not lead to higher inbreeding levels-especially, inbreeding due to recent ancestors was not increased.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Animals (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Animals (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos