Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review.
Brick, Rachelle; Padgett, Lynne; Jones, Jennifer; Wood, Kelley Covington; Pergolotti, Mackenzi; Marshall, Timothy F; Campbell, Grace; Eilers, Rachel; Keshavarzi, Sareh; Flores, Ann Marie; Silver, Julie K; Virani, Aneesha; Livinski, Alicia A; Ahmed, Mohammed Faizan; Kendig, Tiffany; Khalid, Bismah; Barnett, Jeremy; Borhani, Anita; Bernard, Graysen; Lyons, Kathleen Doyle.
Afiliación
  • Brick R; Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. rachelle.brick@nih.gov.
  • Padgett L; VA Central Office, Health Services Research and Development, 1100 1st St NE, Suite 6, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
  • Jones J; Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Sr. PMB-B-045, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
  • Wood KC; ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA, 17055, USA.
  • Pergolotti M; ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA, 17055, USA.
  • Marshall TF; Ivy Rehab Network, 1311 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 140, White Plains, NY, 10605, USA.
  • Campbell G; Duquesne University School of Nursing, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA.
  • Eilers R; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at UPMC Magee, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  • Keshavarzi S; Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
  • Flores AM; Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Silver JK; Biostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Virani A; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Livinski AA; Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 North Michigan Avenue, 11th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Ahmed MF; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 North Michigan Avenue, 11th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Kendig T; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Khalid B; Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Barnett J; Brigham and Women's Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Borhani A; Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bernard G; Department of Rehabilitation Services, Northside Hospital, 1000 Johnson Ferry Road, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA.
  • Lyons KD; National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, OD, NIH, MSC 1150, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
J Cancer Surviv ; 17(6): 1725-1750, 2023 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218521
PURPOSE: To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service's Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021. RESULTS: Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Telemedicina / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Telemedicina / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos