Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing Acquisition Time of Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging of the Rectum with Simultaneous Multi-Slice Acquisition: A Reader Study.
Koëter, Tijmen; Jongen, Germaine; Hanrath-Vos, Eline; Smit, Ewoud; Fütterer, Jurgen; Maas, Marnix; Scheenen, Tom.
Afiliación
  • Koëter T; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: tijmen.koeter@radboudumc.nl.
  • Jongen G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Hanrath-Vos E; Department of Radiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (ETZ), Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Smit E; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Fütterer J; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Maas M; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Scheenen T; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Acad Radiol ; 29(12): 1802-1807, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35256274
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the acquisition time and image quality of simultaneous multislice-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) versus conventional DWI (C-DWI) of the rectum. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In patients scheduled for a magnetic resonance imaging of the rectum, both SMS-DWI and C-DWI were performed on a 3T whole body magnetic resonance scanner. Image quality of the DWI sequences was reviewed by two independent radiologists who were blinded to the method of imaging using a five-point Likert scale (score ranging from 1 (non-diagnostic) to 5 (excellent). The mean scores of SMS-DWI versus C-DWI were compared for the individual readers using a nonparametric test (Wilcoxon signed ranks).

RESULTS:

The SMS-DWI protocol acquisition time was 408 min vs. 724 min per patient, which led to a reduction of 44.1% for the C-DWI protocol, both excluding time for sequence specific adjustments (shimming). No statistical differences between the conventional-, and SMS- diffusion weighted images were seen for both readers. Mean overall image quality of the SMS-DWI TRACE images was 3.5 (SD 1.3) and 3.3 (SD 1.0) for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively. Mean overall image quality of the C-DWI TRACE images was 3.4 (SD 1.3) and 3.2 (SD 1.1) for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Optimized SMS-DWI compared to C-DWI in imaging of the rectum showed similar image quality while a significant acquisition time reduction was achieved.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recto / Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recto / Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article