Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of stimulation time on the expression of human macrophage polarization markers.
Unuvar Purcu, Duygu; Korkmaz, Asli; Gunalp, Sinem; Helvaci, Derya Goksu; Erdal, Yonca; Dogan, Yavuz; Suner, Asli; Wingender, Gerhard; Sag, Duygu.
Afiliación
  • Unuvar Purcu D; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Korkmaz A; Department of Molecular Medicine, Health Sciences Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Gunalp S; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Helvaci DG; Department of Genomic Sciences and Molecular Biotechnology, Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Erdal Y; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Dogan Y; Department of Genomic Sciences and Molecular Biotechnology, Izmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Suner A; Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Wingender G; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Sag D; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265196, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286356
ABSTRACT
Macrophages are highly plastic cells that can polarize into functionally distinct subsets in vivo and in vitro in response to environmental signals. The development of protocols to model macrophage polarization in vitro greatly contributes to our understanding of macrophage biology. Macrophages are divided into two main groups Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages (classically activated) and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages (alternatively activated), based on several key surface markers and the production of inflammatory mediators. However, the expression of these common macrophage polarization markers is greatly affected by the stimulation time used. Unfortunately, there is no consensus yet regarding the optimal stimulation times for particular macrophage polarization markers in in vitro experiments. This situation is problematic, (i) as analysing a particular marker at a suboptimal time point can lead to false-negative results, and (ii) as it clearly impedes the comparison of different studies. Using human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in vitro, we analysed how the expression of the main polarization markers for M1 (CD64, CD86, CXCL9, CXCL10, HLA-DR, IDO1, IL1ß, IL12, TNF), M2a (CD200R, CD206, CCL17, CCL22, IL-10, TGM2), and M2c (CD163, IL-10, TGFß) macrophages changes over time at mRNA and protein levels. Our data establish the most appropriate stimulation time for the analysis of the expression of human macrophage polarization markers in vitro. Providing such a reference guide will likely facilitate the investigation of macrophage polarization and its reproducibility.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interleucina-10 / Activación de Macrófagos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interleucina-10 / Activación de Macrófagos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía