Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Photoelastic, microhardness and roughness analysis of zirconia and stainless steel crowns for primary molars.
Espinoza, Emilia Valenzuela; Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka; Torres, Carolina Paes; Macedo, Ana Paula; Nelson-FIlho, Paulo; Silva, Raquel Assed Bezerra da; Lucisano, Marília Pacífico; Silva, Lea Assed Bezerra da.
Afiliación
  • Espinoza EV; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Palma-Dibb RG; Department of Restorative Dentistry College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Torres CP; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Macedo AP; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nelson-FIlho P; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Silva RABD; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lucisano MP; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, marilia.lucisano@forp.usp.br.
  • Silva LABD; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Dent ; 35(1): 15-19, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316587
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the stress distribution through photoelasticity, microhardness and roughness of intact crowns of primary molars (CC) and the preformed crowns of stainless steel (SSC) and zirconia (ZC) used in dental restorations in pediatric dentistry.

METHODS:

Six healthy primary molars were selected. For the photoelastic models, the teeth were fixed in photoelastic resin. A load of 100 N was applied, and the models were analyzed by transmission polariscope. The Tardy method was used to quantify the fringe order which calculates the maximum stress (T) value in each selected point. The teeth were prepared for cementation of the crowns. The photoelastic test was repeated for each experimental crown. Knoop microhardness was assessed on the buccal surfaces of the CCs, SSCs, and ZCs using a microhardness tester. Parameters were 50 gf for 5 seconds. Roughness was evaluated using a confocal 3-D laser scanning microscope/software at 216x magnification. Roughness average (Ra) values from each model (expressed in µm) were collected and group means were calculated. The stress distribution, microhardness, and roughness data were compared by using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test (α= 0.05).

RESULTS:

There was no difference in the stress distribution for the CCs, SSCs and ZCs. For the microhardness analysis, the ZCs obtained the highest values compared to the CCs and the SSCs (P< 0.001). The CCs were significantly higher than the SSCs (P= 0.027). There was no difference in roughness for the three models (P= 0.615). The SSCs and ZCs showed satisfactory mechanical behavior. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

The use of preformed crowns, especially those made of esthetic materials, is currently increasing in the field of pediatric dentistry. The knowledge of mechanical properties of stainless steel- and zirconia-prefabricated crowns provides scientific foundation for safe clinical application, especially in primary teeth.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acero Inoxidable / Circonio Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acero Inoxidable / Circonio Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México