The 45-year evolution of the Mathys RM monoblock cups: have the paradigm shifts been worthwhile?
Hip Int
; 33(2): 193-202, 2023 Mar.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35438033
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
The Robert Mathys (RM) monoblock uncemented cup is a design less commonly used in primary total hip replacement. It's purported advantages over modular cemented cups are (1) its modulus of elasticity approximating bone, thus mimicking load transmission and the biomechanical behaviour of the cup to better match stresses on the acetabulum, leading to bone-preservation; and (2) as a 1-piece cup there is absence of a mobile interface between a liner and shell, preventing backside wear. Since its inception in 1983 there have been 3 major design changes the RM Classic, the RM Pressfit, and the RM Vitamys with the most modern polyethylene (vitamin E).METHODS:
In a retrospective cohort study of the New Zealand Joint Registry, all designs of RM acetabular cup were reviewed. Data were included from1998 to 2018. All-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were assessed.RESULTS:
In total 13,272 acetabular cups were included. The all-cause revision rates did not differ between the designs. Revision rates for aseptic loosening in the RM Vitamys were lower, but the follow-up was shorter and more larger heads were used. There was no difference in the OHS.CONCLUSION:
All implant designs were safe. The use of larger heads led to a decrease in revisions due to dislocation. It has to be waited out whether the RM Vitamys performs superior in the long-term due to the highly cross-linked polyethylene.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera
/
Prótesis de Cadera
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Hip Int
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Reino Unido