Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in Donation After Circulatory Death in Lung Transplantation in the United States: Impact Of Era.
Bobba, Christopher M; Whitson, Bryan A; Henn, Matthew C; Mokadam, Nahush A; Keller, Brian C; Rosenheck, Justin; Ganapathi, Asvin M.
Afiliación
  • Bobba CM; Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States.
  • Whitson BA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Henn MC; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Mokadam NA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Keller BC; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Rosenheck J; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Ganapathi AM; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10172, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35444490
ABSTRACT

Background:

Use of lungs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has expanded, but changes in donor/recipient characteristics and comparison to brain dead donors (DBD) has not been studied. We examined the evolution of the use of DCD lungs for transplantation and compare outcomes to DBD lungs.

Methods:

The SRTR database was used to construct three 5-year intervals. Perioperative variables and survival were compared by era and for DCD vs. DBD. Geographic variation was estimated using recipient permanent address.

Results:

728 DCD and 27,205 DBD lung transplants were identified. DCD volume increased from Era 1 (n = 73) to Era 3 (n = 528), representing 1.1% and 4.2% of lung transplants. Proportionally more DCD recipients were in ICU or on ECMO pre-transplant, and had shorter waitlist times. DCD donors were older, had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios compared to DBD, more likely to be bilateral, had longer ischemic time, length of stay, post-op dialysis, and increased use of lung perfusion. There was no difference in overall survival. Geographically, use was heterogeneous.

Conclusion:

DCD utilization is low but increasing. Despite increasing ischemic time and transplantation into sicker patients, survival is similar, which supports further DCD use in lung transplantation. DCD lung transplantation presents an opportunity to continue to expand the donor pool.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Pulmón Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Int Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Pulmón Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Int Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos