Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Is the Optimal Strategy for Drain Removal After Mastectomy and Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients? A Multicenter, Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wen, Nan; Ouyang, Chibin; Hu, Xiaoxia; Hou, Lingmi; He, Liqiong; Liu, Chaodong; Xie, Yanyan; Du, Zhenggui.
Afiliación
  • Wen N; Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Ouyang C; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital, Sichuan, China.
  • Hu X; Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Hou L; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan, China.
  • He L; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Guangyuan Center Hospital, Sichuan, China.
  • Liu C; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Guang'an People's Hospital, Sichuan, China.
  • Xie Y; Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Du Z; Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: docduzg@163.com.
J Surg Res ; 277: 148-156, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35490603
INTRODUCTION: The best strategy for drain removal after mastectomy and axillary surgery in breast cancer patients has remained controversial. We conducted a multicenter, three-arm randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal strategy. METHODS: A total of 187 eligible breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy and axillary surgery were randomized into 10 mL (n = 62), 20 mL (n = 63), and 30 mL (n = 63) groups for drain removal on the first day when the output decreased to a corresponding volume in 24 h. The drain duration, total drain duration, incidence of seroma, quality of life, outpatient visit times, healthcare costs, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The median axillary drain durations and total drain durations were all significantly different between three groups (both P < 0.001). The incidences of seroma were 31.1%, 38.3%, and 52.1%, and the difference between the 30 mL and 10 mL groups was significant (RR = 2.41). The 20 mL group reported significantly better quality of life (QoL) in terms of physical functioning (PF) at the 2-week (30 mL versus 20 mL, HR:-14.18) and 3-week (20 mL versus 10 mL, HR: 11.65) follow-up and role functioning (RF) at the 2-week follow-up (20 mL versus 10 mL, HR: 18.15). No between-group differences were found in G-QoL, outpatient visits, costs, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: The 20 mL group had a moderate drain duration, total drain duration, and incidence of seroma but a significant advantage over the other two groups in terms of PF and RF, with relatively low outpatient costs and comparable postoperative complication rates. These findings could aid in clinical decision-making regarding drain removal timing (http://www.chictr.org.cn/: ChiCTR2000028729).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China