Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimising a 3D convolutional neural network for head and neck computed tomography segmentation with limited training data.
Henderson, Edward G A; Vasquez Osorio, Eliana M; van Herk, Marcel; Green, Andrew F.
Afiliación
  • Henderson EGA; The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Vasquez Osorio EM; The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • van Herk M; Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
  • Green AF; The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 22: 44-50, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35514528
Background and purpose: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are increasingly used to automate segmentation for radiotherapy planning, where accurate segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is crucial. Training CNNs often requires large amounts of data. However, large, high quality datasets are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a CNN capable of accurate head and neck (HN) 3D auto-segmentation of planning CT scans using a small training dataset (34 CTs). Materials and Method: Elements of our custom CNN architecture were varied to optimise segmentation performance. We tested and evaluated the impact of: using multiple contrast channels for the CT scan input at specific soft tissue and bony anatomy windows, resize vs. transpose convolutions, and loss functions based on overlap metrics and cross-entropy in different combinations. Model segmentation performance was compared with the inter-observer deviation of two doctors' gold standard segmentations using the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance and mean distance-to-agreement (mDTA). The best performing configuration was further validated on a popular public dataset to compare with state-of-the-art (SOTA) auto-segmentation methods. Results: Our best performing CNN configuration was competitive with current SOTA methods when evaluated on the public dataset with mDTA of ( 0.81 ± 0.31 ) mm for the brainstem, ( 0.20 ± 0.08 ) mm for the mandible, ( 0.77 ± 0.14 ) mm for the left parotid and ( 0.81 ± 0.28 ) mm for the right parotid. Conclusions: Through careful tuning and customisation we trained a 3D CNN with a small dataset to produce segmentations of HN OARs with an accuracy that is comparable with inter-clinician deviations. Our proposed model performed competitively with current SOTA methods.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article