Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' and their caregivers' experiences with regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine for chronic breathlessness associated with COPD: a qualitative study.
Ferreira, Diana; Kochovska, Slavica; Honson, Aaron; Phillips, Jane; Currow, David.
Afiliación
  • Ferreira D; Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia diana.mbhf@gmail.com.
  • Kochovska S; Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Honson A; Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Phillips J; Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Currow D; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 9(1)2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606022
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine is effective in reducing chronic breathlessness in people with advanced disease, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite experiencing a reduction in breathlessness, some patients choose not to continue long-term treatment.

AIM:

This study aimed to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences with regular, low-dose, sustained-release morphine for chronic breathlessness associated with COPD.

METHODS:

A qualitative study embedded in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of regular low-dose, sustained-release morphine for chronic breathlessness for people with COPD and modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale 3-4. After completing the RCT or withdrawing, patients and their caregivers were invited to participate in interviews in their homes focused on their experiences with the trial medication while still blinded to the arm to which they had been allocated. Data analysis used a constant comparative method informed by the principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS:

Thirteen patients and nine caregivers participated. Four themes were identified (1) Receptivity and knowledge; (2) Function as a priority; (3) Harmful and helpful side effects; and (4) Therapy-centred aspects. The concept of 'net effect' emerged from the interplay between themes, subthemes and the decision to continue taking sustained-release morphine during the trial and after trial completion.

CONCLUSION:

Clinicians' support and preconceived ideas about morphine influence the decision to commence sustained-release morphine. The hope for functional improvement is the great driver influencing positively the decision to take sustained-release morphine in the long term. The degree of symptom reduction, improved function, side-effects' severity and caregivers' availability creates a net effect driving patients' decisions to continue or discontinue the medication.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Morfina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Morfina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia