Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Related to Biologic Adherence and Outcomes Among Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Patients.
Osazuwa-Peters, Oyomoare L; Greiner, Melissa A; Oberle, Amber; Oakes, Megan; Thomas, Sheila M; Bosworth, Hayden.
Afiliación
  • Osazuwa-Peters OL; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Greiner MA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Oberle A; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Oakes M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Thomas SM; Patient Informed Development and Health Value Translation, Research & Development, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ.
  • Bosworth H; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham, NC. Electronic address: boswo001@duke.edu
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(9): 2355-2366, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640790
BACKGROUND: Adherence barriers to asthma biologics may not be uniform across administration settings for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in asthma biologic adherence and associated factors, as well as association with a 1-year all-cause emergency department (ED) visit, across administration settings. METHODS: A retrospective study of biologic naïve moderate-to-severe asthma patients with initial biologic therapy between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2020, in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart was performed. Three administration settings were identified: Clinic-only (outpatient office/infusion center), Home (self-administration), and Hybrid setting (mixture of clinic and self-administration). Asthma biologic adherence was the proportion of observed over expected biologic dose administrations received within 6 months from initial therapy. Factors associated with adherence were identified by administration setting, using Poisson regression analyses. A relationship between a 1-year all-cause ED visit and adherence was assessed for each administration setting using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The study cohort was 3932 patients. Biologics adherence was 0.75 [0.5, 1] in Clinic setting, the most common administration setting, and 0.83 [0.5, 1] in both Home and Hybrid settings. Specialist access was consistently associated with better biologic adherence, whereas Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, lower education, Medicare only insurance, and higher patient out-of-pocket cost were associated with worse biologic adherence in some settings. In the Hybrid setting, hazard for a 1-year all-cause ED visit decreased with biologic adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma biologic adherence varied by administration setting. Efforts to improve asthma biologic adherence should consider promoting self-administration when beneficial, improving prior specialist access, and targeting patients with higher risk of suboptimal adherence particularly Black and Hispanic patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Productos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Productos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article