Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 data reporting systems in Africa reveal insights for future pandemics.
Judson, Seth D; Torimiro, Judith; Pigott, David M; Maima, Apollo; Mostafa, Ahmed; Samy, Ahmed; Rabinowitz, Peter; Njabo, Kevin.
Afiliación
  • Judson SD; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Torimiro J; Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
  • Pigott DM; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Maima A; School of Pharmacy, Maseno University, Kisumu, Kenya.
  • Mostafa A; Center of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
  • Samy A; Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
  • Rabinowitz P; Immunogenetics, The Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
  • Njabo K; Departments of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Epidemiol Infect ; 150: e119, 2022 06 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35708156
Globally, countries have used diverse methods to report data during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using international guidelines and principles of emergency management, we compare national data reporting systems in African countries in order to determine lessons for future pandemics. We analyse COVID-19 reporting practices across 54 African countries through 2020. Reporting systems were diverse and included summaries, press releases, situation reports and online dashboards. These systems were communicated via social media accounts and websites belonging to ministries of health and public health. Data variables from the reports included event detection (cases/deaths/recoveries), risk assessment (demographics/co-morbidities) and response (total tests/hospitalisations). Of countries with reporting systems, 36/53 (67.9%) had recurrent situation reports and/or online dashboards which provided more extensive data. All of these systems reported cases, deaths and recoveries. However, few systems contained risk assessment and response data, with only 5/36 (13.9%) reporting patient co-morbidities and 9/36 (25%) including total hospitalisations. Further evaluation of reporting practices in Cameroon, Egypt, Kenya, Senegal and South Africa as examples from different sub-regions revealed differences in reporting healthcare capacity and preparedness data. Improving the standardisation and accessibility of national data reporting systems could augment research and decision-making, as well as increase public awareness and transparency for national governments.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos